Refs. that define U=Amin/Amax or U=(Amin/Amax)*100 Nguyen__'Manufacturing_of_Ultrasonic_Horn_For_Bonding_Non-Woven_Materials' Cardoni__'Characterising_the_dynamic_response_of_ultrasonic_cutting_devices'_(2003_thesis) - p. 84 Margaret Lucas (probably) Patents - Recommended face U for plastic welding - O'Shea__'Enhanced_Vibration_Control_of_Ultrasonic_Tooling_Using_Finite_Element_Analysis' (purchased ASME).pdf --> Umin/Umax = 80% min (p. 259) Angled slots (Holze) Use for outer elements of large block horns where risers may not be as effective? Use for 75mm+ bar horns where risers would interfere with booster? However, could also band end elements or cut notches into slots to -f. Risers Castellation, castellated (like a castellated nut) -- refered to by - "Cardoni - 'Characterising the dynamic response of ultrasonic cutting devices' (2003 thesis).pdf" "Cardoni__'Enhanced_vibration_performance_of_ultrasonic_block_horns'.pdf" Crenellation -- refered to by - 2/Aug/2018 22:15 - not found in any pdf files See https://wikidiff.com/crenellated/castellated (Castellated vs Crenellated - What's the difference?) Spool horns - Davis, Paul H. (Dukane Corp.) - US patent 4131505 (1978-12-26) - 'Ultra-Sonic Horn' See Tab 4 of E. Holze "brown book" (bar horns & spool horns). Cardoni__'Characterising_the_dynamic_response_of_ultrasonic_cutting_devices'_(2003_thesis) - Discusses block horns - Chapter 5, p. 82.. "A detailed strategy to control the vibration behaviour of block horns based on FE models was presented by 0'Shea [4]. 0'Shea provided a design methodology for large ultrasonic horns through investigation of the effects of slot length, slot width, and the number of slots on mode shapes and natural frequencies." (p. 84) Uniformity = the ratio of minimum to maximum response amplitude on the output surface, Umin/Umax (p. 84) "According to O'Shea, a frequency isolation of at least 1 kHz of the tuned mode is necessary to avoid problems of modal coupling during operation." (p. 85) Search for Adachi [51] & O'Shea [41] (effect of slots) [4] = K. O'Shea, "Enhanced vibration control of ultrasonic tooling using finite element analysis", ASME Vibration analysis - Analytical and computational, DE-37,1991, pp. 259-265. Cardoni__'Enhanced_vibration_performance_of_ultrasonic_block_horns' (https://dokumen.tips/download/link/enhanced-vibration-performance-of-ultrasonic-block-horns) --> Bar horn with additional narrow slots The uniformity requirement for a block horn, measured as the ratio of minimum to maximum response amplitude on the output surface, Umin=Umax, is estimated to be 80% [3].The frequency separation should be at least 1 kHz from the longitudinal mode frequency. [3] = K.O'Shea, Enhanced vibration control of ultrasonic tooling using finite element analysis, Proc. ASME, Vibrat.Anal.-Analyt.Computat.DE-37 (1991) 259-265. Half-wave resonators attached to back of bar horn - Elbert's patent -------------------- Uniformity -------------------- Appendix A - Limitations of U eqn -- - Currently consider cavitation load where power varies linearly with ampl. What about resistive type load where power varies with square of ampl? - U as RMS deviation from average -- sum(sqr[Ui - U_bar]) - Appendix graph A2 - rose color plot line is too light, esp when printed. - AM 162 (Brush Wellman AlBeMet: 62% Be, 38% Al) - used in Chromealloy FEA: Density = 2100 kg/m^3 E = 196.5 GPa ==> Co = 9669 m/sec Nu = 0.17 Fatigue = 138 MPa (20 kpsi) rotating beam @ 1e7 cycles - Al-Li 8024 Alloy (Osprey Metals): Density = 2410 kg/m^3 E = 84 GPa ==> Co = 5904 m/sec Nu = ? - Al-Si 4019 Alloy (Osprey Metals): Density = 2780 kg/m^3 E = 98 GPa ==> Co = 5928 m/sec Nu = ? - Al-Zn 7034 Alloy (Sandvik Osprey): Density = 2880 kg/m^3 E = 74 GPa ==> Co = 5069 m/sec Nu = ? Fatigue ~ 300 MPa (43.5 kpsi) (vs ~180 MPa (26 kpsi) for 7075-T6) [both from graph in Sandvik Osprey data sheet @ 5e6 cycles] - Link to pochhammer.html - Update pochhammer.html with pochhammer eqn - see: - poch_prn & pochhamer1.doc (appendix A to uniform.acu) - TP55\CARD\Equation\Poch* & PltPoch* - pochhammer.html has the following which may not be correct (for a thin radially vibrating disk, does U go to 0 or 1.0?) - Find data where inserting a shim between the xdu & horn: the asymmetry pattern remained fixed wrt the horn reference mark. Check 100 mm horn (spool or unshaped). - Update Aerospace nu 0.319 --> 0.333 (see mat tests) [matweb gives nu = 0.33 for Al 7075-T6] 2/19/08: Currently, asymmetry is calc as (1 - Min ampl/Max ampl) where the ampls are measured at geometrically identical locations. However, may not be the best way to calc asymmetry. For example, consider 10mm dia and 100mm dia horns. Both might have the same asymmetry according to the above equation, but the slope of the amplitude change across the 100mm horn would be much less than but the slope of the amplitude change across the 10mm horn. For example, assume Min ampl = 90 and Max ampl = 100. Then the asymmetry is 90% for each. However, for the 10mm dia horn the ampl changes by 10 over a diameter of 10mm, whereas , for the 100mm dia horn the ampl changes by 10 over a diameter of 100mm. Therefore, perhaps should have an "asymmetry per unit length". If want to change the equation, then what to do about rectangular horns (what characteristic length should be used)? If change U from % to decimal, the following files would need to be changed: - Pochhammer.html - OK - uniformity_basic_concepts.html - OK - uniformity1_dict.html (also, provide links to uniformity design pages) - OK Asymmetry. The following horns have asymmetry: HRD-456-3, 100x100, 0 slots - see chapter on Uniformity p. 60 (have not been able to duplicate with FEA) HRD-472-1, 127x127, 2x slots 12.0 wide - See my paper, "Performance of 127 x 127 Aluminum Horns", 1991, p. 9 & figure 14. Asm = .238 Look at 5x5 with frequency cross-overs as slots are lengthened. HRD-051-1, 101 dia unshaped, L = 119.26, xdu = CU90224D. Asm = .533 HRD-051-1, 101 dia unshaped, L = 119.26, xdu = CU90224D. Asm = .314 HRD-051-2, 101 dia unshaped, L = 119.26, xdu = CU90616D. Asm = .559 HRD-064, 100 mm unshaped --> 100mm standard spool, L adjusted at back E. Holze 4" spool horn life test data --> "double-axial" resonance 100 mm spool -- look at data in U/S seminar folders Spool horns: See my doc "\Write\_Design\Resonators\Cylindrical horns\Unslotted\Spool horns\Spool Horn Design Procedure.doc" (2008) Does the face radial ampl depend on the flange thickness? uniformity_improvement_methods.html - Scotto[1] French patent 2203295 --> see Derks, pp. 30-31 Define - Transverse U = relative transverse ampl ("uniformity" probably not a good name) --> discuss with examples